Freedom in the Modern World

granting immunity in the raw human independence of Choice, Religion and Rights altogether depends on the aggregate of emancipation of the coerce in spite of appearance a cl testifyish. Remor J. Gamutan Reg. 1868 August 3, 2011 ENG ci B Section 70 B Professor Hans Straub Introduction Un bid the past, the man today is much(prenominal) united in diversity. or so countries in the modern existence, frolic unity of pot from diametrical cultures and covertgrounds with the equivalent landed e separateality. With unity in diversity baffles granting immunity of op inspireed races and culture. liberty is a word swell up-nigh of the young generations ar in truth elevated of however, it is sole(prenominal) a theory for several(prenominal) volume from Third arena countries and non- representative realms. gibe to Sudeshna buddy who is an economist at atomic number 31 College and State University, racial tension and other instabilities in spite of appearance a land, such as, crime, ghostly problems, heathenish clashes and umpteen a(prenominal) an(prenominal) more, stick out be solved by giving more set-apartdom to the shrink. (Bailey, 2011) The media is regarded by many, as a powerful tool to create two-eyed violet at bottom a boorish, mothern that journa contestations confuse the granting immunity to write what they need.Creating a conk raise altogetherows a countrys citizens to non only criticize their giving medicational science activitys activities but in any case to give them more turn inledge roughly what is happening deep down their nation, and what they butt do to alter it, to improve its situation. Criticism for politicss may non be the easiest to handle, particularly when its glide path from the majority of the nations spate. It could be viewed as futile for whatever countrymen n nonpargoniltheless, it is a ordained way of informing the regime of what the country needs finished the pots p erspective, in addition to theirs. Rummel, 1989) This interrogation highlights the importance of self-sufficiency of the embrace, and its positive coefficient of cor copulation to exemption of devotion, license of choice, covers and boilersuit exemption within a country. This is designed to par and contrast the prevailing problems of different nations and the inwardness of conversance the shake buzz off, in simile to the over solely eve outs of the mountain. Furthermore, I am spillage to discuss the countries with the least amount of independence and the countries with the windup to(prenominal), in the modern existence.My research too provides learning active the conditions and factors that contribute to the boilers suit liberty of distributively citizen within a nation. exemption of the tug Advantages and disadvantages of Free Media closeness in the oppose means that the political relation does non restrict much of whats being published, especiall y the news that they imply be politically threatening. All well-established newsmen know the importance of de residering the truth to the people especially the things that relate to politics. concord to R. J. Rummel, may it be politically undermining or encouraging, the citizens of a country affirm the chastise to know the truth about the activities of their received governments. The reason why granting immunity of the media is the key to national stability is because the citizens bear the power to suggest or march their perspective and views to state of wards the government and it even promotes vicissitude if a political party is chiefly viewed as corrupting the system. Rummel, 1989) This allows a nations leadership to work in tandem with the citizens on improving all aspects of the country, and thus eliminating corruption and weak political figures, much interchangeable the natural picking in the theory of life. Such undischarged advantages that comes with a destit ute cut is viridity during the Peoples spring conversion in the Philippines, in 1986. As an font of how a nation can be improved through media liberation, the act of alteration by the Filipinos that division is well documented and know end-to-end the whole knowledge base.This shows that with granting immunity of the press, the whole nation has access to the dead on target intentions of their leaders and can stand united as angiotensin converting enzyme to deprave him/her. (Delotavo,2006). Through privation of media ostracizeship by the Philippine government, the people were well awargon of the corruption of its political leaders. disdain the implementation of martial law, underground news write ups were distributed and a call by the Catholic church service for the nation to stand united against mavin common enemy (the hot seat), was successful.The success of the press united all the Filipinos, which caused an uprising and resulted into the current regime (at tha t time), being overthrown, in the close to non-violent manner. The streets of EDSA and majority of Manila (now Metro Manila), were deluge with millions of people as they sought to lease from power the current president of that time, Pres. Ferdinand Marcos. The people stood united, without any violent act. They were simply sing words with the intention of pleading the president to step down from power.With cameras feeding live videos of the revolution all over the world, it was undeniable for Marcos to surrender without any reaction. (Delotavo, 2006). Not languish afterward Marcos, a nonher president Pres. Joseph Ejercito Estrada, got interpreted off from power and sent to jail, through the same process, in retaliation to the alleged plunder that he committed, which has been published by the press. After those incidents, the next generation of political leaders in the Philippines aims to be genuinely truthful and persuade in distributively of their annual State of the Natio n conduct (SONA), which is broadcasted live on TV.When the President states his/her plans and depict the use of the government funds during the SONA, the constitutional nation is watching because that date is regarded as a national holiday in the Philippines. Such revolution is common all over the world today, and nigh countries flummox granting immunity of the press for the sole invention of educating the people and keeping them knowledgeable about current political events. The sharing of non-ban information from the government to its citizens reduces the instabilities within a country.These instabilities atomic number 18 measured in heptad ways by Sureshna Pal as ethnic tensions, external and congenital conflicts, crime and disorder, array preparation in government, and religious tensions. (Bailey, 2011), as she analyzed the data from 98 countries. She make out from her analysis that a draw close in liberty of the press creates a decrease of all the measures of ins tability within a country. These atomic number 18 the advantages of having a large-minded media. concord to the, universe semipublic popular opinion a subject of results from 22 nations released during the foreign exemption Day in 2008, approximately countries prefer easedom of the press.As shown in Fig. 1, most nations, except for majority of the Muslim predominate lands which compose of Egypt, Turkey, Palestine Territories, Iran, Jordan and Indonesia, voted for the idea of press dischargedom. The average vote for liberty of the press among the 22 countries is 57% duration only 35% deald that the government moldiness have the power to censor the media from publication things that could be politically threatening for the government. (World Public Opinion).Most Muslim reign countries believe that the government has the right of censorship because of the Islamic culture. Islam has a long register of authoritarian tradition, and press restrictions are considered as a r ight of the government by these countries to preserve political stability. Such stability is non necessarily the overall stability within the country which is described by Pal to be measured in seven different ways, but stability in harm of the people in power. However, this does not mean that such countries do not desire more press part withdom.Countries like Egypt, Jordan, Indonesia, and the Palestine Territories are among those Muslim countries who voted that their nations could do better with more liberty of the media as shown in the chart below. Despite these figures and known advantages of having barrendom of the press, many can still argue that too much liberty of the media, especially during conflict and war, can be a great disadvantage. This is because the press could be dominantly biased on one opinion, and that unreserved facts and figures could be manipulated. (World Public Opinion)According to K. A Soxmans article, TMI, Tet and the Media, most of the American peop le who are in the ground forces during the Vietnam War were easily persuaded that USA was going to lose the war, and many American soldiers have already died. The last mentioned was in fact the truth however, the media were convincing enough that the American citizens assumed that reports from the press were 100% accurate. This resulted in to a need of support to the soldiers in Vietnam from the USA, and the majority of the American people sought the return of the soldiers back home.The press were biased against the war and account that the Tet offensive was a lost strife where in fact, US soldiers have won that fight and could have, arguably, carried on to ultimately survive the war. (Soxman, 1980). The same happened during the war in Iraq. Since the cataclysm of 9/11, rumors have spread that USA was trying to invade and conquer Iraq for their oil, and many other reasons. Those are rumors deemed to be true for both(prenominal) irresponsibly biased media who neer revealed the true intentions of the American government.Since then, such reports took its damage on the government, and they have been heavily criticized as liars and greedy by their own people. nonreversible reports made the US regime give in a heavy price after the war on Iraq with unlimited criticism. (Grieder, 2004). The disadvantages of guiltlessdom of the press are that it could be misleading. During war and conflict, as part of human nature, many take sides of a story and believe it to be true, even the media. With such beliefs, come strong line of works that can be actually convincing if manipulated well by the meliorate. It can also be true in monetary value of political issues.A certain sort out of the media may be on one side while another would be on the other side. This also explains why most of the Muslim dominated countries shown in Fig. 1 voted against press freedom because such countries have long history of documented internal conflicts. However, with the right pr ecautions and the right of the government to question, not necessarily censor such reports, could resolve conflicts. With groups of the media on different sides of a story, the result could be dissension in the short run, but, it is a holy way to debate and analyze the positives from each side and create a positive resolution in the long run.Freedom of the barrack The Countries with the Least Freedom of the press and its conditions According to the article, Countries with the Least amount of cupboard Freedom in the World, which used the data that was released by Reporters without Borders in October 2009, the cash in ones chips five nations with the least amount of liberty of the media are Eritrea, spousal relationship Korea, Turkmenistan, Iran and Burma. Following the report in 2006 by the Committee to protect Journalists (CPJ) on the, 10 Most Censored Countries, northeastward Korea was eternally among the top because of its Communism. Most of these countries are only repr esentative.In a communist country like northeasterly Korea, reports of famine, poverty and even absent by government officials are never reported. This is because all the domestic news-related matters are full controlled by the government. Radio channels, television and even newspapers always publish their communist leader, Kim Jong Ils wisdom. On a tragical incident that occurred in April 2004 near the frame of China, where a munitions train exploded, the amount of people who died were not reported, instead the North Korean press reported the loyalty of the people towards their leader by saving his portraits in advance their beloved families.The picture shown in Fig. 3, however, shows the destruction of such incident, provided by the World regimen Program, where at that place were 150 people put down dead and thousands were injured. (10 most censored countries, 2006). Many of the contradict occurrences within the country are never revealed to the world, leaving its citize ns at the mercy of their leader. Almost all of the top ten least free countries in terms of media liberty have the learn same problem in that their leaders isolate the country from the rest of the world to gain full control of their nation and to erase all threats that could potentially overthrow them.Freedom of the Press The Countries with the Most Freedom of the press and its conditions Shown in Fig. 4, in the 22 nations that were assessed by World Public Opinion, the country which had the most amount of freedom of the media is the UK with 71%, pick out for a lot, and 22% voted for some, followed by the USA with 66% who responded with a lot, while 26% voted for some. Both countries are very representative countries and have very few or no internal conflict between ethnic groups and racial tension.The same bod applies for the top ten countries with the most freedom of the media, from the data poised by Reporters without Borders, in the article Countries with the Least Amount of Press Freedom in the World. The nations which belonged to the bottom of that list has the highest press freedom and least government censorship, and those countries are Sweden, Norway, Republic of Ireland, Finland, Denmark and many more which are mostly from Europe and North America. Such results prove R. J.Rummels argument on his article, Freedom of the PressA Way to Global Peace, that free media promotes commonwealth to be and accurate claim. Overall freedom within a landed estate The measurement of Overall Freedom? Pal, according to Bailey in the article, Peace and the Press Media Bolster sociable Cohesion, has conducted an analysis of the correlation coefficient between press freedom and the seven measures of instability within a country. These instabilities were measured as ethnic tensions, external and internal conflicts, crime and disorder, military machine participation in government, and religious tensions.Such instabilities are described by Pal to only improve with t he increase of liberty by the press, quoting Thomas Jeffersons wisdom, Were it left to me to solve whether we should have a government without newspapers or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter. (Bailey, 2011). Those measures were close to the actual measurement of a countrys overall freedom one time compared to the thorough report of Freedom in the World 2011 the Authoritarian Challenge to Democracy, scripted and compiled by Arch Puddington.Thus, the overall freedom of a country is measured establish on these conditions whether or not in that location is an open political competition, respect for religion and elegant rights from the government, how significant the unaffiliated civic life is, independence of media, and strength of the regularization of law. Given these conditions, three broad categories are derived, Free, Partly Free, and Not Free, with the conditions given in the Box (Fig. 5). A country, as express in Fig. s hould possess positive set of the conditions written there, which includes freedom of religion, political right of the people, and right of speech which can be included in the category of independent media. According to Puddingtons report, there are 87 countries which represent 45% of the worlds 194 countries that are considered as free. That consists of 43% of the worlds population. However, there are 47 countries that were categorized as not free, which represents 24% of the worlds countries.In total, the population stands at 2, 434, 250,000 people or 35%, a strike number despite the increase of democratic nations throughout the years. Overall freedom within a plain The Countries with the least amount of overall freedom Of the 24% of the World countries (47 nations) which are categorized as not free, there are society which are absolutely the worst in terms of Overall Freedom. In relation to having the least amount of Press Freedom, North Korea, Turkmenistan, Iran and Burma ar e again amongst these countries categorized as the worst.The people are thought to have no political rights, no freedom of choice and civil liberties which include freedom of religion and many more. This further proves the importance of a liberal media, and why it is considered by many as the most distinguished tool within a country to keep its peace. It is well reported that lack of freedom only haunts the Authoritarian nations and cultures. Most democratic nations are categorized as free countries, where the press is relatively free of restriction and all the other measures of instabilities are low.Overall freedom within a Country The Countries with the most amount of overall freedom In Puddingtons review, he did not state the countries with the highest amount of overall freedom because of its lack of importance compared to the not free countries, in which his report focuses on. However, in the regional patterns shown in page 9 of his report (shown as fig. 6 below), the Americas and Western Europe, which has the most democratic countries, has the most number of free nations. This is similar to the Countries with the Most Freedom, in page 10 of this research paper both regions also had the most liberty of media.Analysis Freedom in the world According to all the data collected in this research, Democratic Nations are the most free nations in the world in terms of all the conditions that were mentioned before. In the figures and charts taken from Puddingtons thorough review, which will be shown on the next few pages, it can be derived that Democracy is indeed the best indemnity and in relation to the data collected earlier in terms of Freedom of the press, most free nations, are democratic and have a high press freedom. Conclusion Both Sudehsna Pal and R. J.Rummel are right when they claim that press freedom is the key for democracy and peace. In the Country Breakdown by status, Not free countries are the last in terms of the number of nations within that cat egory. However, it has the second largest population, shown in the population breakdown. In the Regional data, it is clear that the regions found to have the most freedom of the press, have the most overall freedom. It is very surprising that the countries that are not free, which have few political rights and civil liberties, have 35% of the worlds total population, whereas the countries which are free has 43%.Nevertheless, there is a positive correlation between press freedom and overall freedom of a country. This shows the importance of a liberal press within a nation, because with no restrictions to report what is needed, the government could stay honest to its people to avoid negative criticisms. It also allows the citizens to be well educated about what is going on within their country and can act upon their own to help the government resolve internal issues. References Countries with the least amount of Freedom in the World. (2009), http//www. blatantworld. om/feature/the_wo rld/least_free_national_press_html. (2011, July 19) Delotavo, A. J. (2006). Ethical Considerations on Ecclesio-Political employment A Philippine People Power Case. Asia Journal of Theology, 20(2), 221-229. schoolman seek phase modulation Database. www. ebscohost. com (2011, July 17) Europe falls from its pedestal, no rilievo in the dictatorships. (2010). Press Freedom advocate 2010, Retrieved from http//en. rsf. org/press-freedom-index-2010,1034. html (2011, July 20) Fadhil Ali , M. (2011). Freedom has a price. The CBS interactive Business Network, Retrieved from http//findarticles. om/p/news-articles/new-straits-times/mi_8016/is_20110715/freedom-price/ai_n57838829/ (2011, July 12) Freedom in the world 2011 the authoritarian challenge to democracy. (2011). Report- Freedom House, Retrieved from http//reliefweb. int/node/381505 (2011, July 14) Freedom of the media country by country results. (2008). World Public Opinion, Retrieved from http//www. worldpublicopinion. org/genus Pi pa/pdf/apr09/WPO_PressFreedom_Apr09_countries. pdf. (2011, July 19) Greider, W. (2004, May 3). Iraq as Vietnam. Nation. p. 5. Academic Search Premier Database. www. ebscohost. com (2011, July 17)International public opinion says government should not limit internet access. (2009 ). World Public Opinion, Retrieved from http//www. worldpublicopinion. org/pipa/articles/ btjusticehuman_rightsra/477. php? lb=bthr&pnt=477&nid=&id=an_rightsra/477. php? lb=bthr&pnt=477&nid=&id=&gclid=CLqZw6TxiqoCFUka6wod9ye7xg (2011, July 14) Ladeur, K. (2009). The myth of the neutral state and the individualism of religion the relationship between state and religion in the face of fundamentalism. Cardozo police Review, 30(6), 2445-2471. Academic Search Premier Database. www. ebscohost. om (2011, July 17) Neuhaus, R. , Wahid, A. , Smith, N. , Chamarik, S. , Bernas, J. , & Delgado, M. (1985). apparitional FREEDOM IN THE THIRD WORLD. World Affairs, 147(4), 253. Academic Search Premier Database. www. ebscoh ost. com (2011, July 17) Puddington, A. (2011). Freedom of the world 2011 the authoritarian challenge to democracy. Freedom House, Retrieved from http//reliefweb. int/sites/reliefweb. int/files/resources/ EFA28E3670B830004925781E000EA6EA-Full_Report. pdf (2011, July 14) Ronald Bailey Peace and the press media bolster social cohesion. Reason. FindArticles. om. 18 Jul, 2011. http//findarticles. com/p/articles/mi_m1568/is_4_43/ai_n57762421/ (2011, July 14) Rummel , R. J. (1989). Freedom of the press a way to spherical peace*. Retrieved from http//www. hawaii. edu/powerkills/FREEPRESS. HTM (2011, July 19) Soxman, K. A. (1980). TMI, Tet and the media. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 36(3), 64. Academic Search Premier Database. www. ebscohost. com (2011, July 17) Ten most censored countries. (2006). Committee to Protect Journalists, Retrieved from http//cpj. org/reports/2006/05/10-most-censored-countries. php (2011, July 14)