Critical Response Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 1

Critical Response - Essay typefaceAlso, the author points out the similarity of the case to the inclusion of the enunciate In graven image we trust in the United States dollar however, Wilde distinguishes this similarity as inverted as she contends that the focus is absolutely different the In God we trust in US dollar is employed for business undertakings while under God in the Pledge of Allegiance is used in recitation of loyalty. While the author makes manifold convert points in her article, there atomic number 18 three most salient points that should not be overlooked (1) the phrase under God is descriptive of something and that description, while does not attempt to establish a religion, creates a cogitate to the deeply-embedded Christian heritage of America (2) that under God and In God do we trust are phrases that are used distinctively for very different purposes (3) Many Americans do not believe in God as a matter of fact, 70 or 80% of the Americans are atheist (Wilde 2). Therefore, there is more reason for the rewording of the Pledge of Allegiance as not everyone is willing to identify themselves with the include phrase. Under God is descriptive of something and it is divisive Since 1954, the Pledge of Allegiance reads I pledge all(a)egiance to the glad of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands one nation under God, indivisible, with Liberty and jurist for all (Djupe 329). Wilde is persuasive in the fact that the phrase under God is descriptive of something and that description is something ironical to the intention of the pledge throwaway the phrases with Liberty and Justice for all the First Amendment of the United States constitution strongly prohibits the establishment of religion in any law that the Congress would intend to create. In this regard, it can be observed every American citizen, whether an permanent resident or a citizen, should be given complete justice and impropriety, including religious lib erty and the right to exercise their religious freedom nevertheless, the fact that the Pledge of Allegiance is for every American citizen to recite, whether they are willing to do it or not, it breaks the intention of the pledge that there is justice and liberty for all considering that not everyone believes in God and yet everyone are deemed to recite it. Even if they choose to be silent in the phrase when reciting the pledge, why should they be silent in the first place? While Chief Justice Rehnquist calls the phrase under God as a descriptive phrase, he was not competent to specify what the phrase is describing. Granting that the Chief Justice was right, for the sake of argument, it could then be inferred that the phrase is descriptive of monotheism - something that denies legion(predicate) non-Christian Americans to conform to the law and thus, a political harassment of some sort. Since it is a pledge intended for the quite a little of the United States of America, then no on e is exempted from it, including atheists. By and large, the wordings have fallen short of the real slip of America a land that is free. How can a country that claims to be free, with Justice and Liberty for all would make an act that is discordant for its people? The solution may be just be a revision of the pledge itself and nothing more.